Post Reply 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NAC agrees to the Demand for Pay Parity
Author Message
Administrator Offline

Posts: 1,638
Joined: Nov 2008
Post: #1
NAC agrees to the Demand for Pay Parity

The demand of Parity in Fixation of Pay of Promotes & Direct Recruits - Fixing the pay of promotes at least at Entry Pay for Direct Recruits in each grade, has been agreed in the National Anomaly Committee


Staff side stated that anomaly in this case is basically due to the fact that it is for the first time that CPC has recommended specific entry level pay for Direct recruits (DRs). This has resulted in employees who are appointed in service prior to the DRs and got promoted earlier getting less pay as compared to their counterparts recruited directly and who joined after 1.1.2006. The official side stated that in such cases stepping up of pay is permissible subject to certain conditions. However, the staff side insisted that on promotion, the pay of all promotees should be fixed at the entry level of pay of that post as in the case of direct recruits, whenever there is a provision of direct recruitment in the RRs.

The staff side requested that in cases where no direct recruitment actually took place even though RRs provided for the same or when a DR did not join, stepping up of pay should be considered.

The suggestion of the staff side was considered by the official side, who responded by stating that whenever there is a provision of direct recruitment in the recruitment rules, pay on promotion would be fixed at the prescribed minimum of the entry pay as provided for the Direct Entrants in the Revised Pay Rules, irrespective of the fact whether direct recruitment has actually taken place or not. The staff side agreed to close the issue thereafter.

As the result of this pay of promotive SSE during his promotion from Junior Engineer will be fixed minimum Rs.17140 on par with the pay of direct recruit SSE.

12-16-2012 10:53 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)